If You Have Issues With Judge Janice Williams, Click Here...
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Solano Families United

Dedicated To Fighting Bias In The Solano County Family Court System

  • Complete Our Survey
  • Get Started!
  • Our Plea
  • Our Mission
    • Get Involved! Contact Us
    • Prevent Garry Ichikawa From Coming Back as An Assigned Judge
    • Ask The California State Auditor to Audit Solano County Family Court Rulings
  • File a 170.6 Before It’s Too Late!
    • Filing a Complaint With The Presiding Judge
    • Transcripts
  • Prosecuting Perjury

Solano Family Justice – Our Mission

Solano Families United is a community advocacy project founded by a group of concerned parents, litigants, attorneys, county employees, school staff and other community members in Solano County. All members volunteer their time to pursue the goal of fairness, transparency and oversight in the family court system.

Our plan of action is to use grassroots advocacy to bring change in the Solano Family Court system which, for years, has exercised unrestricted bias in court proceedings regarding custody, visitation and domestic violence. We plan to pursue government oversight, at the local and state level, and if necessary, petition for recall of elected officials abusing their position. We will spotlight violations of judicial canon, ethics and codes of conduct, to bring forth accountability and resolution for families negatively impacted by the unchecked bias.

We also serve as a lighthouse for impacted litigants to find resources, support groups, and share information, so they don’t feel isolated by the negative impact from the Family Court system.

Our Goals

  • To have a Family Court System with fair and unbiased Jurists that rule in the best interests of the families involved in litigation, particularly in high-conflict cases and cases involving domestic violence and sexual assault.
  • To have a Family Court System with Jurists that are unbiased against women, litigants of low socio-economic status, and litigants who do not speak English as a primary language.
  • Ensure that victims of domestic abuse and sexual assault are able to obtain protective orders when they meet the burden of proof required by law. Ensure that Jurists review domestic violence cases in a fair and unbiased manner, even if that requires a different Jurist presiding over DV actions than the Jurist presiding over custody, visitation and dissolution actions. Solano County Superior Court has received grant money from the Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women, specifically to address domestic violence issues, and has routinely ruled in conflict with their intended use for grant funds.
  • Ensure that Jurists follow family law code section 3044 (see below). Solano County Family Court Judges have routinely awarded custody to perpetrators of domestic violence and placed the victims on Supervised Visitation, requiring hefty monthly fees to agencies administered by parties with close social ties with Solano County Family Court Judges.
  • Ensure that litigants of low socio-economic status, most of whom cannot afford legal representation, receive fair treatment in family court and do not statistically fare worse than litigants represented by attorneys.
  • Ensure proper oversight for allegations of misconduct and bias from Family Court Judges, Clerks and Child Custody Recommending Counselors (often referred to as mediators), particularly in cases involving domestic violence.
  • At minimum, audio recording of all family law hearings so that discrepancies in transcripts can be resolved. Many litigants in Solano County allege their transcripts have been slightly modified to reduce the appearance of improper conduct on behalf of Judges Ichikawa, Carringer and Unger, and that transcripts do not properly convey the improper comments and demeanor of Judges during hearings and trials.

California Family Law Code Section 3044

(a) Upon a finding by the court that a party seeking custody of a child has perpetrated domestic violence against the other party seeking custody of the child or against the child or the child’s siblings within the previous five years, there is a rebuttable presumption that an award of sole or joint physical or legal custody of a child to a person who has perpetrated domestic violence is detrimental to the best interest of the child, pursuant to Section 3011. This presumption may only be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence.

Source

Primary Sidebar

Search

Pages

  • A Plea To Journalists, Writers, Reporters And Influencers
  • Ask The California State Auditor to Audit Solano County Family Court Rulings
  • FAQ?
  • Filing a Complaint With The Presiding Judge
  • Get Involved! Help Fight Bias And Corruption In Family Court
  • Get Started!
    • Tell Your Story
  • Got Carringer? You May Want To File a 170.6 Before It’s Too Late!
  • Is Solano County Avoiding Providing Transcripts In Unger’s and Carringer’s Cases?
  • Letter to Solano County District Attorney: Prosecuting Perjury
  • Please Complete Our Demographic Survey… Your Voice Matters!
  • Prevent Garry Ichikawa From Coming Back as An Assigned Judge
  • Solano Family Justice – Our Mission
  • Watch This Video If You’ve Been Harmed By Judge Unger or Carringer

Recent Posts

  • We Have A New Problem: Judge Janice Williams and Her Judicial Misuse of TROs and DVROs
  • If You Heard About Retired Judge Garry Ichikawa…
  • How To Request Transcripts Form Your Hearing with Judge Unger, Carringer or Ichikawa
  • How Solano Count Family Law Judge Christine Carringer Caused The Abuse Of A Seven Year Old Child
  • Why Judge Garry Ichikawa Being Overturned On Appeal Is Important To Understand If You Have Domestic Violence In Your Family Law Case
  • Executive Director Of Fairfield Non-Profit Pleads Guilty To Embezzling DOJ Funds Intended For Domestic Violence Victims And Altering Records To Thwart A Federal Investigation
  • Solano County Family Court Judge Christine Carringer Gave Custody Of A Two Year Old To A Sex Trafficker And Known Felon
  • A Restraining Order May Have Saved Her Life, But Due To Ichikawa’s Bias, We Will Never Know
  • Did You Know Judge Garry Ichikawa Represented A Child Molester When He Was An Attorney?
  • The Duplicitous Posturing of Judge Garry Ichikawa on Domestic Violence
  • 2003 Judicial Council Report On High Conflict Family Law Cases
  • Did You Know Pro-Per (Self-Represented) Litigants Can Be Reimbursed For Court Transcripts?
  • Where To Go For Help When Free Help Isn’t Enough And Attorneys Are Too Expensive
  • Do You Have A Complaint About A Solano County Supervised Visitation Facility?
  • Could Judicial Oversight Have Prevented The Death of 5 Year Old Cali Anderson?

::: Useful Links :::

It’s Official California Family Courts are Broken

Copyright © 2023 · Solano Families United · **Contact Us**