If You Heard About Retired Judge Garry Ichikawa...
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Solano Families United

Dedicated To Fighting Bias In The Solano County Family Court System

  • Complete Our Survey
  • Get Started!
  • Our Plea
  • Our Mission
    • Get Involved! Contact Us
    • Prevent Garry Ichikawa From Coming Back as An Assigned Judge
    • Ask The California State Auditor to Audit Solano County Family Court Rulings
  • File a 170.6 Before It’s Too Late!
    • Filing a Complaint With The Presiding Judge
    • Transcripts
  • Prosecuting Perjury

How California Superior Court Judges Evade Accountability with Judicial Immunity Under The Assigned Judges Program

February 23, 2018 By 1 Comment

Excerpted from Is the Chief subverting the constitution with assigned judges?

The assigned judges program is ripe for abuse by the AOC and it is being abused. According to some preliminary statistics gathered from the AOC, about 400 judges served as assigned judges in 2010. Out of those 400 judges, about a third of them (133) sat on the bench managing a courtroom and being re-appointed to the bench every 60 days for many, many years.

In many cases, many of these 133 of the ‘good ol boys club’ retire on a Friday and start collecting their pensions. On Monday, they return to the exact same courtroom they served in previously before they retired and they are earning nearly double their pay.

Prior to their retirement they filled the slot of an elected judicial officer, subject to retention elections and CJP oversight. Once appointed, they are no longer subject to retention elections nor CJP oversight. They are free to roam California’s courtrooms as loose cannons accountable to only the AOC, which as we know, means they are accountable to no one.

Assigned judges are a vehicle under which judges can be backfilled due to absences, workload or challenges and require re-appointment to the bench by the chief justice every 30-60 days. These are intended as temporary assignments and while most assigned judges might spend no more than 90 days per year sitting on the bench, some of the assigned judges ‘good ol boys club’ have been sitting as an assigned judge in the same courtroom, collecting two salaries for greater than 10 years. This brings us to the controversial use of perpetual appointment as an abuse of authority. Does the Chief Justice have the right to appoint and re-appoint a judge to the bench for years at a time and undermine the will of the electorate?

Meet Retired Judge Jack Halpin of Shasta County. Retired from the bench, he has been re-appointed in perpetuity since 1994 – for over seventeen years. While he should have been subject to three retention elections, he is above the law and has been subjected to no retention elections. It must be nice to be Jack Halpin.

With only AOC oversight (and we all know how that goes: bury the dirt and leave no trace) and the locals questioning weather or not Judge Halpin suffers from dementia the sole determinant of his fitness for the bench is two hundred miles south inside the AOC.

Of course, having no method whatsoever to determine Judge Halpin’s fitness for the bench and for his respected service as a member of the “good ol boy’s club” Judge Halpin enjoys the uncommon perk of absolute judicial immunity. He is fit for the bench because the AOC re-assigned him to the bench and that’s the end of it. All complaints against Jack Halpin spanning over a decade are without merit because the AOC says they are. Of course, should anyone actually file suit to question this, it will be the same group that appointed him that will work to defend him. They will pay for and pick the counsel, they will choose the venue and the judge to hear any such case. Unlike judges going before the CJP who must get their own legal counsel, Judge Halpin can rely on a far higher power to defend him in the AOC.

Filed Under: Court Procedures

Login
guest
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greg Eugene Poole
Greg Eugene Poole
3 years ago

Judicial immunity is absurd. What other profession has such a thing? Doctors, engineers, mechanics are all held responsible for their decisions and actions. Whether thru insurance or other forms of equity when someone is wronged, there is some form of obligation to correct that wrong. Giving judge a blank check to abuse someone and then get a free pass is an invitation to corruption. California Legislature needs to forms a Judicial Review Committee and change the entire legal procedure. These judges are raping the public and then claiming immunity when caught. That is a disgrace.

Reply

Primary Sidebar

Search

Pages

  • A Plea To Journalists, Writers, Reporters And Influencers
  • Ask The California State Auditor to Audit Solano County Family Court Rulings
  • FAQ?
  • Filing a Complaint With The Presiding Judge
  • Get Involved! Help Fight Bias And Corruption In Family Court
  • Get Started!
    • Tell Your Story
  • Got Carringer? You May Want To File a 170.6 Before It’s Too Late!
  • Is Solano County Avoiding Providing Transcripts In Unger’s and Carringer’s Cases?
  • Letter to Solano County District Attorney: Prosecuting Perjury
  • Please Complete Our Demographic Survey… Your Voice Matters!
  • Prevent Garry Ichikawa From Coming Back as An Assigned Judge
  • Solano Family Justice – Our Mission
  • Watch This Video If You’ve Been Harmed By Judge Unger or Carringer

Recent Posts

  • If You Heard About Retired Judge Garry Ichikawa…
  • How To Request Transcripts Form Your Hearing with Judge Unger, Carringer or Ichikawa
  • How Solano Count Family Law Judge Christine Carringer Caused The Abuse Of A Seven Year Old Child
  • Why Judge Garry Ichikawa Being Overturned On Appeal Is Important To Understand If You Have Domestic Violence In Your Family Law Case
  • Executive Director Of Fairfield Non-Profit Pleads Guilty To Embezzling DOJ Funds Intended For Domestic Violence Victims And Altering Records To Thwart A Federal Investigation
  • Solano County Family Court Judge Christine Carringer Gave Custody Of A Two Year Old To A Sex Trafficker And Known Felon
  • A Restraining Order May Have Saved Her Life, But Due To Ichikawa’s Bias, We Will Never Know
  • Did You Know Judge Garry Ichikawa Represented A Child Molester When He Was An Attorney?
  • The Duplicitous Posturing of Judge Garry Ichikawa on Domestic Violence
  • 2003 Judicial Council Report On High Conflict Family Law Cases
  • Did You Know Pro-Per (Self-Represented) Litigants Can Be Reimbursed For Court Transcripts?
  • Where To Go For Help When Free Help Isn’t Enough And Attorneys Are Too Expensive
  • Do You Have A Complaint About A Solano County Supervised Visitation Facility?
  • Could Judicial Oversight Have Prevented The Death of 5 Year Old Cali Anderson?
  • Is Judge Carringer Stopping Litigants From Disqualifying Her From Presiding Over Cases?

::: Useful Links :::

It’s Official California Family Courts are Broken

Copyright © 2022 · Solano Families United · **Contact Us**

wpDiscuz